warehouse: be empty along thames river

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.65
, office building
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings office
Weight: 0.66
, cold storage
Weight: 0.64
, distributor
Weight: 0.61
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, factory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be empty along thames river 1.00
were built along rivers 0.86
be built near rivers 0.83
be near water 0.79
dump waste into rivers 0.78
affect rivers 0.77
be near sea cooler 0.76
be near sea cooler in summer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(place, be near sea cooler in summer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(warehouse, be empty along thames river)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(place, be near sea cooler in summer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(place, be near sea cooler in summer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(factory, were built along rivers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(factory, be built near rivers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(factory, be near water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(place, be near sea cooler in summer)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(factory, were built along rivers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(factory, were built along rivers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(factory, be built near rivers)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(factory, be built near rivers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(factory, be near water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factory, be near water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(warehouse, be empty along thames river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(warehouse, be empty along thames river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(place, be near sea cooler in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(factory, were built along rivers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(factory, be built near rivers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(factory, be near water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(warehouse, be empty along thames river)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(place, be near sea cooler in summer)