warwick: was attacked

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.54
, attraction
Weight: 0.50
, town
Weight: 0.50
, city
Weight: 0.47
, area
Weight: 0.45
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.33
, brooklyn
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33
, dover
Weight: 0.33
, kingston
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was attacked 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(dover, was attacked)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(dover, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(dover, was attacked)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(warwick, was attacked)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(warwick, was attacked)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(warwick, was attacked)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(warwick, was attacked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dover, was attacked)