washington: be called city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.71
, montana
Weight: 0.66
, national capital
Weight: 0.62
, new orleans
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.61
Siblings maryland
Weight: 0.58
, new york city
Weight: 0.38
, miami
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called city 1.00
be called district 0.82
be considered district 0.79
be named district 0.77
be in district 0.77
be called district of columbia 0.76
is district 0.76
have district 0.76
be considered district of columbia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(washington, be called city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(new orleans, be called city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(washington, be called city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be called city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(new york, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be called city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(new york, be called city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(miami, be called city)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, be called city)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(new york city, be called city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(new york, be called city)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(washington, be called city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(new orleans, be called city)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(washington, be called city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(new york city, be called city)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(new york city, be called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(philadelphia, be called city)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, be called city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(miami, be called city)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(miami, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(washington, be called city)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called district of columbia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(washington, have district)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(washington, have district)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(washington, be called district of columbia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(washington, have district)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(washington, have district)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(washington, be called district of columbia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(washington, be called district of columbia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(washington, be called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(new orleans, be called city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new york city, be called city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(philadelphia, be called city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(miami, be called city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(new orleans, be called city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(washington, be called city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(new york, be called city)