washington: be famous for apple

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.71
, montana
Weight: 0.66
, new orleans
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.61
, giant
Weight: 0.60
Siblings maryland
Weight: 0.58
, new york city
Weight: 0.38
, miami
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, london
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous for apple 1.00
be famous for jazz 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new orleans, be famous for jazz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(washington, be famous for apple)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be famous for jazz)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be famous for jazz)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(new orleans, be famous for jazz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(washington, be famous for apple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(washington, be famous for apple)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(washington, be famous for apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(washington, be famous for apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(new orleans, be famous for jazz)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(washington, be famous for apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(new orleans, be famous for jazz)