washington: be north of oregon

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.71
, montana
Weight: 0.66
, new orleans
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.61
, giant
Weight: 0.60
Siblings maryland
Weight: 0.58
, new york city
Weight: 0.38
, miami
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, london
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be north of oregon 1.00
be south of pennsylvania 0.85
be at in florida 0.80
be a part of florida 0.79
be a part of pennsylvania 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(miami, be a part of florida)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(miami, be at in florida)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(maryland, be south of pennsylvania)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, be a part of pennsylvania)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(maryland, be south of pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(maryland, be south of pennsylvania)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(miami, be at in florida)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(miami, be at in florida)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(miami, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(miami, be a part of florida)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(philadelphia, be a part of pennsylvania)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, be a part of pennsylvania)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(washington, be north of oregon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(washington, be north of oregon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(maryland, be south of pennsylvania)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(philadelphia, be a part of pennsylvania)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(miami, be at in florida)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(washington, be north of oregon)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(miami, be a part of florida)