wasp: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.71
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, insect
Weight: 0.58
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.53
Siblings honey bee
Weight: 0.73
, hornet
Weight: 0.61
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, moth
Weight: 0.38
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
be worse years 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hornet, be bad year)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hornet, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hornet, be bad year)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(wasp, be bad year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wasp, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wasp, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(wasp, be bad year) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hornet, be bad year)