wasp: go on flowers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.71
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, insect
Weight: 0.58
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.53
Siblings honey bee
Weight: 0.73
, hornet
Weight: 0.61
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, moth
Weight: 0.38
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
go on flowers 1.00
visit flowers 0.90
pollinate flowers 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(insect, visit flowers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wasp, go on flowers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(insect, pollinate flowers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wasp, go on flowers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(insect, visit flowers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(insect, pollinate flowers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(insect, visit flowers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(insect, pollinate flowers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(moth, visit flowers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(insect, visit flowers)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(insect, pollinate flowers)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(moth, visit flowers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(moth, visit flowers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(wasp, go on flowers)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wasp, visit flowers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(wasp, pollinate flowers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(wasp, visit flowers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wasp, pollinate flowers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wasp, pollinate flowers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wasp, visit flowers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wasp, pollinate flowers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(wasp, visit flowers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(wasp, go on flowers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insect, visit flowers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(insect, pollinate flowers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(moth, visit flowers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insect, visit flowers)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(wasp, go on flowers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(insect, pollinate flowers)