waste: be recycled in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be recycled in nature 1.00
be recycled 0.93
is biodegradable 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(waste, be recycled in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(waste, be recycled)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(waste, be recycled)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(waste, be recycled)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(waste, be recycled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, be recycled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(waste, be recycled)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(waste, is biodegradable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(waste, is biodegradable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(waste, is biodegradable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(waste, is biodegradable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(waste, be recycled in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(waste, be recycled in nature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waste, be recycled in nature)