waste: decompose in municipal landfill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, substance
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.56
, trichloroethylene
Weight: 0.42
, composting
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.33
, landfill
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
decompose in municipal landfill 1.00
decompose in landfill 0.96
be left in piles at landfill site 0.84
different to regular composting 0.76
is incineration 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(composting, different to regular composting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(composting, different to regular composting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(composting, different to regular composting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(waste, decompose in landfill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(waste, is incineration)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(waste, is incineration)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(waste, is incineration)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waste, is incineration)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(waste, be left in piles at landfill site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(waste, decompose in municipal landfill)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(waste, decompose in municipal landfill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(composting, different to regular composting)