watch: be at department store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pocket watch
Weight: 0.78
, item
Weight: 0.59
, instrument
Weight: 0.56
, gem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wrist watch
Weight: 0.68
, tv set
Weight: 0.32
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.32
, dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, action figure
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at department store 1.00
be at store 0.88
be at toy department 0.86
be at watch store 0.77
be at jewlery store 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(watch, be at department store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(action figure, be at toy department)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(watch, be at department store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(action figure, be at toy department)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(action figure, be at toy department)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(watch, be at department store)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(watch, be at watch store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(watch, be at jewlery store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at jewlery store)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(watch, be at jewlery store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(watch, be at jewlery store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at watch store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(watch, be at watch store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(watch, be at watch store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at department store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(watch, be at department store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(action figure, be at toy department)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(watch, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)