watching: be in client

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in client 1.00
be in client shit 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(watching, be in client)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(watching, be in client shit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(watching, be in client shit)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(watching, be in client shit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in client shit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(watching, be in client)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(watching, be in client) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(watching, be in client)