watching: is satisfying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.48
, method
Weight: 0.48
, guy
Weight: 0.47
, match
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.46
Siblings remember
Weight: 0.31
, laughing
Weight: 0.31
, listening
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is satisfying 1.00
pop satisfying 0.89
is entertaining 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(listening, is satisfying)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(listening, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(listening, is satisfying)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(watching, is satisfying)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(watching, pop satisfying)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(watching, pop satisfying)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(watching, pop satisfying)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(watching, pop satisfying)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(watching, is entertaining)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(watching, is entertaining)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(watching, is entertaining)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(watching, is entertaining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(watching, is satisfying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(watching, is satisfying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(watching, is satisfying) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(listening, is satisfying)