water: be at ice shave

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water sport
Weight: 0.78
, sediment
Weight: 0.68
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, liquid water
Weight: 0.64
Siblings shallow water
Weight: 0.82
, ocean water
Weight: 0.79
, sea water
Weight: 0.77
, pure water
Weight: 0.68
, salt water
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ice shave 1.00
be at ice 0.86
be freeze to make ice 0.81
be able to turn in to ice 0.81
be at crush ice 0.81
be at ice rink 0.80
be at ice storm 0.79
be extract from ice 0.78
form ice when freeze 0.78
has more energy than water ice 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(liquid water, has more energy than water ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(water, be at ice shave)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(liquid water, has more energy than water ice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(liquid water, has more energy than water ice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(liquid water, has more energy than water ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(water, be at ice shave)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(water, be at ice shave)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(water, be at ice rink)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(water, be at ice rink)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(water, be at ice rink)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(water, be at ice rink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(water, be at ice shave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(water, be at ice shave)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(liquid water, has more energy than water ice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(water, be at ice shave) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(liquid water, has more energy than water ice)