watercolor: be considered difficult

Related concepts

Parents	medium Weight: 0.62 , color Weight: 0.61 , print Weight: 0.55 , work Weight: 0.54 , painting Weight: 0.53
Siblings	photography Weight: 0.35 , oil painting Weight: 0.34 , collage Weight: 0.34 , sculpture Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered difficult	1.00
is difficult	0.93
is easier	0.76
is hard	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(work, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(painting, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(painting, is hard)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(work, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(painting, is hard)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(work, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(oil painting, is difficult)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(photography, is hard)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(oil painting, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(work, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(painting, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(oil painting, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(oil painting, is difficult)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(oil painting, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(oil painting, is hard)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(photography, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(photography, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(watercolor, is difficult)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, is difficult)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(watercolor, is difficult)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(watercolor, is hard)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(watercolor, is easier)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, is hard)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(watercolor, is hard)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(watercolor, is hard)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(watercolor, is difficult)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(watercolor, is easier)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, is easier)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(watercolor, is easier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Salient(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(painting, is hard)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(work, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(oil painting, is difficult)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photography, is hard)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(oil painting, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(painting, is hard)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(watercolor, be considered difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(work, is hard)