watermelon: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.65
, melon
Weight: 0.64
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, variety
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cantaloupe
Weight: 0.37
, crab apple
Weight: 0.37
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.37
, strawberry
Weight: 0.37
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 2018 1.00
be bad year 1.00
be good year 0.95
be expensive year 0.82
go bad 0.82
be bad at night 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(watermelon, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(watermelon, be good year)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(watermelon, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(watermelon, be bad at night)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(watermelon, go bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(watermelon, go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be bad at night)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(watermelon, be bad at night)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(watermelon, be good year)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be good year)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(watermelon, be bad at night)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(watermelon, be good year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(watermelon, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(watermelon, be bad year)