watershed: be vulnerable to pollution

Related concepts

Parents	resource Weight: 0.63 , area Weight: 0.56 , topic Weight: 0.55 , thing Weight: 0.52
Siblings	estuary Weight: 0.33 , shoreline Weight: 0.33 , salt lake city Weight: 0.33 , wildlife Weight: 0.32 , biodiversity Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be vulnerable to pollution	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(watershed, be vulnerable to pollution) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(estuary, be vulnerable to pollution)