watt: reject fully automatic model

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, player
Weight: 0.49
, individual
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lightbulb
Weight: 0.31
, amp
Weight: 0.31
, projector
Weight: 0.31
, bulb
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
reject fully automatic model 1.00
reject automatic model 0.95
reject fully model 0.93
reject model 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(watt, reject fully automatic model)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(watt, reject automatic model)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(watt, reject fully model)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(watt, reject automatic model)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(watt, reject fully model)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(watt, reject automatic model)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(watt, reject automatic model)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(watt, reject model)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(watt, reject fully model)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(watt, reject fully model)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(watt, reject model)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(watt, reject model)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(watt, reject model)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(watt, reject fully automatic model)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(watt, reject fully automatic model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(watt, reject fully automatic model)