weapon: be at cop car

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, model
Weight: 0.59
Siblings machine gun
Weight: 0.73
, nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.73
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.72
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.70
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cop car 1.00
be at car show 0.78
be at police station 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(model, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weapon, be at cop car)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(model, be at car show)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(model, be at car show)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(model, be at car show) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(weapon, be at cop car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(weapon, be at cop car)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(weapon, be at police station)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be at police station)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weapon, be at police station)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(weapon, be at police station)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be at cop car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weapon, be at cop car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(model, be at car show)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(weapon, be at cop car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(model, be at car show)