weapon: be used to destruction

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, model
Weight: 0.59
Siblings machine gun
Weight: 0.73
, nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.73
, fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.72
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.70
, razor blade
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to destruction 1.00
be need to prevent destruction and death 0.88
be used to total annihilation 0.78
be destructive 0.76
destroy city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, be used to total annihilation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, destroy city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(machine gun, be used to total annihilation)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(machine gun, be used to total annihilation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(nuclear weapon, destroy city)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, destroy city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(weapon, be used to destruction)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(weapon, be destructive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(weapon, be need to prevent destruction and death)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(weapon, be used to destruction)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, destroy city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(weapon, be used to destruction)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(machine gun, be used to total annihilation)