weapon: were bad in world war 1

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, accessory
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chemical weapon
Weight: 0.86
, biological weapon
Weight: 0.86
, assault rifle
Weight: 0.73
, machine gun
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
were bad in world war 1 1.00
were used in world war 2 0.95
be in world war 1 0.95
were made in world war 2 0.94
were needed in world war 2 0.93
were created during world war 1 0.91
were developed during world war 1 0.90
was important in world war 0.89
were assigned in world war 2 0.87
were important in war 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(assault rifle, were used in world war 2)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(machine gun, were used in world war 2)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(machine gun, were used in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(machine gun, were used in world war 2)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(assault rifle, were used in world war 2)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(assault rifle, were used in world war 2)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(weapon, were used in world war 2)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, were made in world war 2)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, were needed in world war 2)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(weapon, were created during world war 1)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(weapon, were developed during world war 1)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(weapon, was important in world war)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(weapon, were assigned in world war 2)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(weapon, were important in war)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made in world war 2)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(weapon, were used in world war 2)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(weapon, were needed in world war 2)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(weapon, were developed during world war 1)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(weapon, were created during world war 1)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made in world war 2)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, were assigned in world war 2)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(weapon, were made in world war 2)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(weapon, were important in war)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were needed in world war 2)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were assigned in world war 2)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(weapon, was important in world war)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(weapon, were needed in world war 2)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(weapon, were assigned in world war 2)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were used in world war 2)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(weapon, were used in world war 2)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were developed during world war 1)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(weapon, were developed during world war 1)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were created during world war 1)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(weapon, were created during world war 1)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(weapon, were important in war)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(weapon, was important in world war)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(weapon, was important in world war)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were important in war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(weapon, were bad in world war 1)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(machine gun, were used in world war 2)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were bad in world war 1)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(assault rifle, were used in world war 2)