weasel: be at law office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, carnivore
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, vermin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings badger
Weight: 0.35
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.33
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at law office 1.00
be at law firm 0.87
be at office 0.84
be at public office 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(weasel, be at law office)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(weasel, be at law firm)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at law firm)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at office)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(weasel, be at office)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at public office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at public office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(weasel, be at public office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(weasel, be at office)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(weasel, be at law firm)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(weasel, be at public office)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at law firm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at law office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(weasel, be at law office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(weasel, be at law office)