weasel: be at mulberry bush

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.59
, mammal
Weight: 0.53
, carnivore
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, vermin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings badger
Weight: 0.35
, skunk
Weight: 0.34
, beaver
Weight: 0.33
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.33
, fox
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mulberry bush 1.00
be at bush 0.86
be at cherry tree 0.77
be at tree 0.76
be at hole under ficus 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at bush)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, be at bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(fox, be at bush)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(weasel, be at mulberry bush)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at cherry tree)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(weasel, be at cherry tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(weasel, be at cherry tree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(weasel, be at tree)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(weasel, be at tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(weasel, be at cherry tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at mulberry bush)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(weasel, be at mulberry bush)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(weasel, be at mulberry bush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, be at bush)