weatherman: have names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.46
, expert
Weight: 0.45
, scientist
Weight: 0.44
, group
Weight: 0.43
, idiot
Weight: 0.39
Siblings meteorologist
Weight: 0.33
, astronomer
Weight: 0.30
, television show
Weight: 0.30
, geologist
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have names 1.00
have weird names 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(group, have weird names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(weatherman, have names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(group, have weird names)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(group, have weird names)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(group, have weird names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(weatherman, have names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(weatherman, have names)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, have weird names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(weatherman, have weird names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(weatherman, have weird names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(weatherman, have weird names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, have names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(weatherman, have names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(group, have weird names)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(weatherman, have names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(group, have weird names)