webcam: is more convenient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.66
, video
Weight: 0.58
, digital camera
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, application
Weight: 0.55
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, projector
Weight: 0.36
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more convenient 1.00
is convenient 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(digital camera, is convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(webcam, is more convenient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is convenient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is convenient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(digital camera, is convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(webcam, is more convenient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(webcam, is more convenient)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(webcam, is convenient)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(webcam, is convenient)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(webcam, is convenient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is convenient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(webcam, is more convenient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(digital camera, is convenient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(webcam, is more convenient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(digital camera, is convenient)