weed: be bad year

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents substance
Weight: 0.62
, show
Weight: 0.61
, tv show
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, herb
Weight: 0.56
Siblings horsetail
Weight: 0.54
, poa
Weight: 0.42
, marijuana
Weight: 0.33
, narcotic
Weight: 0.33
, cannabis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
is bad for 0.86
go bad 0.82
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(marijuana, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(poa, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cannabis, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(poa, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(poa, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cannabis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cannabis, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(marijuana, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(marijuana, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(weed, be bad year)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(weed, go bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(weed, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(weed, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weed, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(weed, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(weed, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(weed, go bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(weed, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(weed, be bad year)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(poa, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(marijuana, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(weed, be bad year)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(cannabis, has quality bad)