well: be at kansa

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents part
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
, development
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.32
, far
Weight: 0.32
, like
Weight: 0.32
, baseball field
Weight: 0.31
, soccer field
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kansa 1.00
be at collegae 1.00
be at near 0.81
be at outside 0.78
be at open place 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(field, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(well, be at kansa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(field, be at kansa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(field, be at kansa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(football field, be at collegae)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at near)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at outside)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at open place)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(field, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(well, be at kansa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(football field, be at collegae) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(football field, be at collegae)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(soccer field, be at near) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at near)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(soccer field, be at outside) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at outside)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(soccer field, be at open place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at open place)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(well, be at kansa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(well, be at kansa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be at kansa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(football field, be at collegae)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at near)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at outside)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at open place)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(well, be at kansa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(field, be at kansa)