west berlin: was described as bone in throat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents west germany
Weight: 0.72
, city
Weight: 0.54
, guard
Weight: 0.36
Siblings quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.33
, new york city
Weight: 0.33
, hartford
Weight: 0.32
, rochester
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was described as bone in throat 1.00
was described as bone in throat of union 0.96
was described as bone 0.94
was described as bone in throat of soviet union 0.87
was described as 0.80
was described 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of union)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of soviet union)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of union)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(west berlin, was described as)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of union)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of union)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(west berlin, was described)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described as bone)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of soviet union)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of soviet union)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat of soviet union)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described as)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(west berlin, was described as bone)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(west berlin, was described as)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(west berlin, was described as)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(west berlin, was described)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(west berlin, was described)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(west berlin, was described as bone in throat)