west: be in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.65
, area
Weight: 0.64
, land
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.59
Siblings east
Weight: 0.74
, south
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.39
, south dakota
Weight: 0.38
, north dakota
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in australia 1.00
was important to india 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(west, be in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(west, was important to india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(west, was important to india)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(west, was important to india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(west, was important to india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(west, be in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(west, be in australia)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(west, be in australia)