west: enemies of are branded terrorists

Related concepts

Parents	region Weight: 0.65 , area Weight: 0.64 , land Weight: 0.64 , site Weight: 0.59
Siblings	east Weight: 0.74 , south Weight: 0.39 , north Weight: 0.39 , south dakota Weight: 0.38 , north dakota Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
enemies of are branded terrorists	1.00
is enemies	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(north, is enemies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(north, is enemies) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(north, is enemies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(west, enemies of are branded terrorists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(west, enemies of are branded terrorists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(west, enemies of are branded terrorists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(west, enemies of are branded terrorists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(north, is enemies)