west: has physical part zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.65
, area
Weight: 0.64
, land
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.59
Siblings east
Weight: 0.74
, south
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.39
, south dakota
Weight: 0.38
, north dakota
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zones 1.00
has physical part region 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(east, has physical part region)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(east, has physical part region) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(east, has physical part region)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(west, has physical part zones)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(west, has physical part region)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(west, has physical part region)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(west, has physical part region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(west, has physical part region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(west, has physical part zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(west, has physical part zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(west, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(east, has physical part region)