west: have more rainfall

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.65
, area
Weight: 0.64
, land
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.59
Siblings east
Weight: 0.74
, south
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.39
, south dakota
Weight: 0.38
, north dakota
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more rainfall 1.00
is island flooding 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(area, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(west, have more rainfall)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(area, have more rainfall)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(area, have more rainfall)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(area, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(west, have more rainfall)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(west, have more rainfall)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(west, is island flooding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(west, is island flooding)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(west, is island flooding)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(west, is island flooding)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(west, have more rainfall)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(west, have more rainfall)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(area, have more rainfall)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(west, have more rainfall)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(area, have more rainfall)