west: were slaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.65
, area
Weight: 0.64
, land
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.59
Siblings east
Weight: 0.74
, south
Weight: 0.39
, north
Weight: 0.39
, south dakota
Weight: 0.38
, north dakota
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
were slaves 1.00
were slaves seen 0.96
were african slaves 0.92
were african slaves seen 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(west, were slaves)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(west, were slaves seen)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(west, were african slaves)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(west, were slaves seen)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(west, were african slaves seen)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(west, were slaves seen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(west, were african slaves)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(west, were african slaves seen)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(west, were african slaves)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(west, were african slaves seen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(west, were slaves seen)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(west, were african slaves seen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(west, were african slaves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(west, were slaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(west, were slaves)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(west, were slaves)