western australia: is big

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents australia
Weight: 0.65
, state
Weight: 0.62
, country
Weight: 0.60
, region
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, west germany
Weight: 0.36
, central american country
Weight: 0.36
, east asia
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sydney, is big)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sydney, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sydney, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(western australia, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(western australia, is big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(western australia, is big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(western australia, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sydney, is big)