western australia: was reluctant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents australia
Weight: 0.65
, state
Weight: 0.62
, country
Weight: 0.60
, region
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, west germany
Weight: 0.36
, central american country
Weight: 0.36
, east asia
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was reluctant 1.00
was called reluctant state 0.97
was initially reluctant 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(western australia, was reluctant)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(western australia, was called reluctant state)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(western australia, was called reluctant state)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(western australia, was initially reluctant)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(western australia, was called reluctant state)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was called reluctant state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(western australia, was initially reluctant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was initially reluctant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(western australia, was initially reluctant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was reluctant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(western australia, was reluctant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(western australia, was reluctant)