western australia: was settled

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents australia
Weight: 0.65
, state
Weight: 0.62
, country
Weight: 0.60
, region
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.36
, west germany
Weight: 0.36
, central american country
Weight: 0.36
, east asia
Weight: 0.35
, sydney
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was settled 1.00
was first settled 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(western australia, was settled)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(australia, was settled)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(australia, was settled)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(western australia, was settled)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(western australia, was settled)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(western australia, was first settled)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(western australia, was first settled)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(western australia, was first settled)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was first settled)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was settled)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(western australia, was settled)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(australia, was settled)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(western australia, was settled) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(australia, was settled)