westies: roll in poop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents small dog
Weight: 0.46
, terrier
Weight: 0.43
Siblings westie
Weight: 0.30
, chihuahua
Weight: 0.29
, maltese
Weight: 0.29
, pug
Weight: 0.28
, poodle
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
roll in poop 1.00
have poop 0.91
eat poop 0.88
have white poop 0.88
roll in fox poo 0.87
eat cat poop 0.84
roll on back 0.83
roll in grass 0.81
be white poo 0.81
go pooping 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(terrier, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(terrier, roll in fox poo)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(small dog, eat poop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(terrier, eat poop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(small dog, eat cat poop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(terrier, roll in poop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(terrier, eat poop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(small dog, eat poop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(small dog, eat cat poop)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(terrier, roll in fox poo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(terrier, roll in poop)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(terrier, eat poop)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(small dog, eat poop)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(small dog, eat cat poop)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(terrier, roll in fox poo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(chihuahua, roll in grass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(poodle, have white poop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(poodle, be white poo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(terrier, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(terrier, roll in fox poo)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(small dog, eat poop)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(terrier, eat poop)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(small dog, eat cat poop)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(westies, roll in poop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(chihuahua, roll in grass)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chihuahua, roll in grass)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(poodle, have white poop)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(poodle, have white poop)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poodle, be white poo)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(poodle, be white poo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(westies, roll in poop)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(westies, eat poop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in grass)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in fox poo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(westies, eat poop)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(westies, roll in grass)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(westies, roll in poop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(terrier, eat poop)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(terrier, roll in poop)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(small dog, eat cat poop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(small dog, eat poop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(terrier, roll in fox poo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(chihuahua, roll in grass)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(poodle, have white poop)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(poodle, be white poo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(small dog, eat cat poop)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(terrier, eat poop)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(terrier, roll in poop)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(small dog, eat poop)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(westies, roll in poop)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(terrier, roll in fox poo)