wetland: have high biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high biodiversity 1.00
have high level of biodiversity 0.97
provide habitats for many living things 0.77
benefit wildlife 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(estuary, have high biodiversity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(estuary, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(estuary, have high biodiversity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wetland, have high biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have high level of biodiversity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wetland, have high level of biodiversity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, have high level of biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, have high level of biodiversity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(wetland, benefit wildlife)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(wetland, have high biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(estuary, have high biodiversity)