whale: be considered mammal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.78
, wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.70
, ocean
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings humpback whale
Weight: 0.90
, blue whale
Weight: 0.86
, whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.82
, pilot whale
Weight: 0.78

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered mammal 1.00
be called mammal 0.97
is mammal 0.97
be considered mammals 0.92
be mammals 0.88
is mammals 0.88
called mammals 0.87
is classified as mammals 0.85
be classified as mammals 0.85
be considered animals 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(whale, be considered mammal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mammal, is mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(mammal, is mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, be considered mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be considered animals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, is mammal)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is mammals)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mammal, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(whale, be considered mammal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(humpback whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, be considered mammal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(blue whale, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(blue whale, is mammal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale shark, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is mammal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(humpback whale, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale shark, is mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is mammals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(whale, be considered mammal)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be called mammal)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, is mammal)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(whale, is mammal)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, is mammals)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(whale, be called mammal)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(whale, is mammal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(whale, is mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(whale, be called mammal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(whale, is mammal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(whale, is mammals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(whale, be called mammal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(whale, is mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(whale, be considered mammal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(whale shark, is mammal)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(blue whale, is mammal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(whale shark, is mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(humpback whale, be considered mammal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(blue whale, be considered animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(whale, be considered mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(mammal, is mammals)