wheat: was bad for soil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cereal grain
Weight: 0.79
, grain
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, crop
Weight: 0.66
, ingredient
Weight: 0.62
Siblings barley
Weight: 0.42
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.40
, oat
Weight: 0.40
, wheat germ
Weight: 0.39
, rice
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad for soil 1.00
affect soil 0.89
grow best in soil 0.86
be sown in organic soil better than other soils 0.83
grow best in clay soil 0.82
be bad for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(crop, be sown in organic soil better than other soils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wheat, was bad for soil)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(crop, affect soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wheat, was bad for soil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(crop, affect soil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(crop, be sown in organic soil better than other soils)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(crop, affect soil)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(crop, be sown in organic soil better than other soils)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(crop, affect soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(crop, be sown in organic soil better than other soils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(wheat, was bad for soil)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(wheat, grow best in clay soil)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(wheat, grow best in clay soil)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(wheat, grow best in clay soil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wheat, grow best in soil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(wheat, grow best in clay soil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(wheat, grow best in soil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wheat, grow best in soil)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(wheat, grow best in soil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wheat, was bad for soil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(crop, affect soil)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(crop, be sown in organic soil better than other soils)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(crop, affect soil)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(wheat, was bad for soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(crop, be sown in organic soil better than other soils)