whiplash: has state pain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.72
, pain
Weight: 0.57
, neck
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings concussion
Weight: 0.36
, swelling
Weight: 0.34
, fracture
Weight: 0.34
, chest pain
Weight: 0.34
, paralysis
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pain 1.00
has state injury 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(neck, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(whiplash, has state pain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(neck, has state pain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(neck, has state pain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(neck, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has state pain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(whiplash, has state pain)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has state injury)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(whiplash, has state injury)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(whiplash, has state injury)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(whiplash, has state injury)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has state pain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(whiplash, has state pain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(neck, has state pain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(whiplash, has state pain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(neck, has state pain)