whipped cream: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(whipped cream, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(whipped cream, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(whipped cream, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(whipped cream, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(whipped cream, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(whipped cream, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(whipped cream, go bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(whipped cream, go bad)