white paper: be called paper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.71
, paper
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.65
, publication
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.59
Siblings paper towel
Weight: 0.37
, paper currency
Weight: 0.37
, toilet paper
Weight: 0.37
, balance sheet
Weight: 0.34
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called paper 1.00
be called white paper 0.95
be called white papers 0.83
be called papers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(white paper, be called paper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(paper, be called paper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(paper, be called paper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, be called paper)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(white paper, be called paper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(toilet paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(toilet paper, be called paper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(white paper, be called paper)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(white paper, be called white paper)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called white paper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(white paper, be called white paper)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called white papers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(white paper, be called white papers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called papers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(white paper, be called white paper)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(white paper, be called papers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(white paper, be called white papers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(white paper, be called white papers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(white paper, be called papers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(white paper, be called papers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(white paper, be called paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(paper, be called paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(toilet paper, be called paper)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(white paper, be called paper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(paper, be called paper)