:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, is map)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(wight, is map)
Similarity expansion
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(wight, is uk map)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wight, is uk map)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wight, is uk map)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(wight, is uk map)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(wight, is map)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wight, is map)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tasmania, is map)