wild animal: be at tree

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, cat
Weight: 0.67
, pet
Weight: 0.66
Siblings prairie dog
Weight: 0.79
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.76
, zebra
Weight: 0.76
, deer
Weight: 0.76
, elk
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at tree 1.00
be at low brances of tree 0.89
hide in tree 0.85
climb up tree 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cat, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at tree)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cat, climb up tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at tree)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cat, be at tree)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cat, climb up tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(cat, be at tree)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(cat, climb up tree)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cat, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at tree)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(cat, climb up tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(wild animal, be at tree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cat, be at tree)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cat, climb up tree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cat, be at tree)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(wild animal, be at tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cat, climb up tree)