wild animals: is hunted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, cougar
Weight: 0.37
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hunted 1.00
be hunted by humans 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is hunted)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(prairie dog, is hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(prairie dog, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(prairie dog, is hunted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(cougar, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cougar, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(wild animals, is hunted)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, be hunted by humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wild animals, be hunted by humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wild animals, be hunted by humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wild animals, be hunted by humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is hunted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wild animals, is hunted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cougar, is hunted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(wild animals, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prairie dog, is hunted)