wildfire: be direct threat to human population

Related concepts

Parents	event Weight: 0.62 , fire Weight: 0.59 , crisis Weight: 0.58 , situation Weight: 0.55 , emergency Weight: 0.55
Siblings	fire extinguisher Weight: 0.35 , fire department Weight: 0.35 , fire alarm Weight: 0.35 , fire hose Weight: 0.34 , fire brigade Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be direct threat to human population	1.00
change population	0.81
be constant threat in shrubland	0.79
be threat in summer	0.78
was major threat in medieval cities	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(fire, be constant threat in shrubland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(wildfire, be direct threat to human population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(fire, be constant threat in shrubland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(fire, be constant threat in shrubland)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(fire, be constant threat in shrubland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(wildfire, be direct threat to human population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(wildfire, be direct threat to human population)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(wildfire, change population)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(wildfire, change population)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, change population)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(wildfire, change population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be direct threat to human population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(wildfire, be direct threat to human population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(fire, be constant threat in shrubland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(wildfire, be direct threat to human population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(fire, be constant threat in shrubland)