wildfire: be more common in western us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.62
, fire
Weight: 0.59
, crisis
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.55
, emergency
Weight: 0.55
Siblings fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.35
, fire department
Weight: 0.35
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.35
, fire hose
Weight: 0.34
, fire brigade
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in western us 1.00
is more common 0.86
be more important than water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fire, be more important than water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be more common in western us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fire, be more important than water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fire, be more important than water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fire, be more important than water)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wildfire, be more common in western us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(wildfire, be more common in western us)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, is more common)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wildfire, is more common)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(wildfire, is more common)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wildfire, is more common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be more common in western us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(wildfire, be more common in western us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fire, be more important than water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(wildfire, be more common in western us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fire, be more important than water)