wildlife: be endangered in india

Related concepts

Parents	land Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.58 , subject Weight: 0.56 , attraction Weight: 0.55 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	geyser Weight: 0.43 , national forest Weight: 0.35 , wetland Weight: 0.35 , conservation Weight: 0.34 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be endangered in india	1.00
be important in india	0.90
be endangered in antarctica	0.84
is endangered	0.84
be in africa	0.78
be important in south africa	0.77
be expensive in japan	0.77
be in south africa	0.76
be important to florida	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(land, be expensive in japan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(resource, be important to florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(land, be expensive in japan)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(resource, be important to florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(land, be expensive in japan)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(wetland, is endangered)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important in south africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(land, be expensive in japan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(resource, be important to florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(wetland, is endangered) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(wetland, is endangered)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(conservation, be important in south africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(conservation, be important in south africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important in india)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(wildlife, be important in india)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important in india)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(wildlife, is endangered)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(wildlife, is endangered)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(wildlife, is endangered)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in antarctica)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important in india)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(resource, be important to florida)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(land, be expensive in japan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(wetland, is endangered)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(conservation, be important in south africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(land, be expensive in japan)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(wildlife, be endangered in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(resource, be important to florida)