wildlife: poach threatening

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
poach threatening 1.00
be threatened 0.77
is threatened 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is threatened)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be threatened)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(wetland, is threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(wetland, is threatened)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(wetland, be threatened) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, be threatened)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(wildlife, poach threatening)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, poach threatening)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wildlife, poach threatening)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(wetland, is threatened)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, poach threatening) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wetland, be threatened)