will: be physically possible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents order
Weight: 0.60
, action
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tonight
Weight: 0.31
, game show
Weight: 0.31
, happy hour
Weight: 0.31
, memorial day
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be physically possible 1.00
be possible 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, be possible)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(will, be physically possible)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, be possible)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(action, be possible)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, be possible)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(will, be physically possible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(will, be physically possible)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(will, be possible)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(will, be possible)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(will, be possible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(will, be possible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(will, be physically possible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(will, be physically possible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, be possible)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(will, be physically possible)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, be possible)